What happens when fixing an alleged design or construction error leaves an owner with a project that’s better than originally promised? In this episode, we explore the doctrine of betterment—a key damages principle that prevents claimants from turning construction disputes into windfalls.

Host David Suchar is joined by Keith Bergeron of Deutsch Kerrigan (New Orleans) and Matt Ryan of Allensworth (Austin) for a deep dive into how courts handle “added benefit” claims. We unpack the interplay between design omissions, retrofit costs, and contractual risk allocation, with real-world examples and case law from across the country.

Whether you represent owners, designers, or contractors, this episode offers practical insight into how betterment shapes liability and claim strategy for construction disputes.

What does it mean to meet the “standard of care” in the construction industry—and what happens when that standard is called into question? In this episode, we’re joined by Chris Caddell of Spire Consulting and Tim Ross of Andrews Myers to explore how the standard of care applies to contractors, design professionals, and peer reviewers. Drawing on years of real-world experience, Chris and Tim share practical strategies for addressing standard of care issues in contracts, avoiding common pitfalls, and proactively managing risk from the earliest stages of a project.

In this episode we discuss a book recently published by the ABA Forum on Construction Law—"Design-Build and EPC Contracting: A Practical Legal Guide” (2024)—one of the ABA Forum on Construction Law's newest books. Construction lawyer and book editor Ken Rubinstein discusses his role as editor (on behalf of other editors Nicole Lentini, Logan Hollobaugh, Wendy Venoit, and Paul Varela), the content and process for developing the book, current issues that face project Owners and emerging industry trends, and practical tips for how to navigate the unique challenges in this space as construction lawyers.