I want to know why Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi turned up at Bondi Beach immediately after Australians and Israeli nationals were killed there.

This is a woman who has been a long-time supporter of Palestine, and so is the Greens Party. That’s on the public record. I do not believe the Greens represent Australians. They represent a political minority, protected by the system.

What Australians are entitled to ask is this: why was she there, and what was she doing?

And there is another question that has not been answered.
Did she know the father involved, given reports he was from the same place she grew up in?

I am done listening to the lack of accountability of our govt and policing investigations because when politicians insert themselves into the aftermath of violence, scrutiny is warranted.

Australians are done being told not to ask questions.

I will not be silent and I will not allow a two tier policing and govt system to continue in our country.

Support the show

Follow Code Black with Madison King www.linktr.eee https://linktr.ee/codeblackMK?

What we’ve witnessed is a complete failure of federal authorities, New South Wales Police, and government leadership—failure to enforce existing laws and failure to remove people who should never have been here in the first place.

If you can freely return to your country of birth or your family’s homeland, you are not a refugee. Refugee status was never meant to be permanent convenience—it was meant to be protection when return is impossible.

The only people who truly cannot be sent “back” are those with bloodlines rooted here: Aboriginal Australians, and the descendants of convicts and early settlers who built this country.

We’ve been lied to before. John Howard’s gun law crusade followed Port Arthur—yet Martin Bryant was never given a public trial, never tested in open court, and Australians were told to accept the narrative without question.

Disarming citizens while refusing to enforce borders, deport extremists, or hold agencies accountable is not public safety.

It’s political cowardice dressed up as law.

Support the show

In the quiet sprawl of Sydney’s Bonnyrigg suburb—where kebab shops hum beside corner delis and neighbours rarely ask too many questions—the Akram family blended seamlessly into the multicultural backdrop for nearly three decades.

Sajid Akram, 50, arrived from Lahore, Pakistan, in 1998 on a student visa, chasing education and opportunity in Australia, according to reporting by the Sydney Morning Herald

Somewhere in Sydney’s western suburbs—possibly through Pakistani community circles—he met Verena Akram, an Anglo-Australian woman born and raised locally around Bankstown. Fair-skinned, unmistakably local in accent, with no recorded immigrant background, she worked part-time in administrative roles, according to interviews she later gave to SMH and Daily Mail Australia.

They married in 2001.

That marriage secured Sajid a partner visa, followed by permanent residency. Despite living in Australia for more than two decades, he never became a citizen, instead renewing his status through resident return visas after multiple overseas trips—primarily back to Pakistan—over the years, as confirmed by federal authorities.

Their only child, Naveed Akram, was born in Sydney in 2001. An Australian citizen by birth. No siblings. Raised, schooled, and socialised entirely in Australia. By all outward appearances, an ordinary young man—working as a bricklayer until being laid off months before the attack, frequenting gyms, eating halal, keeping to himself.

Yet behind the façade, warning signs had already surfaced.

In 2019, ASIO questioned Naveed at the age of 18 over suspected links to a Sydney-based ISIS-aligned cell. No charges were laid, but he was flagged by intelligence agencies, a fact later confirmed by the Prime Minister and reported by ABC News.

But questions linger.

The family travelled frequently to Pakistan. Sajid’s visa history shows multiple returns since at least 2010, often accompanied by his son, according to immigration reporting and ministerial briefings. What conversations were had? What influences absorbed? What ideologies hardened quietly, out of public view?

On December 14, 2025, the illusion of normality collapsed.

Sajid and Naveed Akram drove to Bondi Beach in a rented SUV, arriving at a Hanukkah community event. According to police, witnesses, and forensic investigators, two black ISIS flags were displayed—one mounted on the vehicle’s bonnet and later recovered as evidence.

From a nearby footbridge, they opened fire using six rifles legally licensed to Sajid.

Sixteen people were killed. Among them, a 10-year-old girl and Rabbi Eli Schlanger. More than forty others were injured.

Sajid was shot dead by police at the scene. Naveed was critically wounded and remains under guard in hospital, according to NSW Police and international reporting by Reuters, BBC, Al Jazeera, and The New York Times.

After the attack, her public denial intensified.

She told media her son had no firearms. No extremist views. No troubling associations.

Yet authorities confirmed recovered jihadist material, ISIS symbolism, and a prior ASIO intervention. These facts sit uneasily beside claims of ignorance.

This is no longer just a story about one violent act.

It is about intelligence warnings that stopped short. About firearm licensing that remained intact. About years of radicalisation unfolding in plain sight—or just beyond the willingness to see.

Bonnyrigg’s quiet streets now carry a different weight. Bondi’s shoreline, once synonymous with summer and celebration, bears the memory of bloodshed.

Australia is owed answers.

Not slogans.

Not deflections.

But truth.

Support the show