This lecture provides a detailed theological analysis of the Book of Revelation, also known as the Apocalypse. The speaker argues for the book's internal unity by pointing to its consistent doctrinal focus on Christ, its clear and uniform plan structured around the number seven, its inimitable style, and its recurring literary devices. These devices include anticipations, antitheses (like Jerusalem vs. Babylon), a distinct rhythm, and the symbolic use of numbers. The speaker identifies two primary sources for the book: the author's deep immersion in the Old Testament for symbolism and the New Testament for doctrine, combined with what are presented as real, divinely inspired visions.

The discussion then moves to the canonicity and authenticity of the work. While the book was readily accepted as scripture in the Western Church, it faced some initial doubts in the East, particularly from the school of Antioch, though it was eventually embraced. The speaker notes that early Protestant reformers like Luther also hesitated before accepting it, a question later settled for Catholics at the Council of Trent. The lecturer strongly defends the traditional view that the author is St. John the Evangelist. This is supported by external evidence from early Church Fathers like Justin Martyr and Irenaeus and internal evidence from the text itself, which reveals an author who was a Jewish Christian with great authority, had lived in Asia Minor, and was exiled on Patmos, all details that align with the life of St. John.

Finally, the speaker addresses and refutes common objections to St. John's authorship, which are primarily based on perceived differences between the Apocalypse and his other writings, such as the Fourth Gospel. The lecturer dismisses arguments about variations in style, grammar, vocabulary, and even doctrine. He explains that these differences are superficial and can be attributed to the distinct literary genre of apocalyptic writing compared to a gospel or an epistle. Furthermore, he points out underlying similarities in themes, such as the use of allegory and a high, "eagle-like" sense of the supernatural, arguing that these shared characteristics confirm a common author.

This lecture provides a systematic theological analysis of the Book of the Apocalypse, focusing on its teachings regarding the Holy Spirit. The speaker begins by identifying the Holy Spirit as the primary "force of prophetic inspiration" that allows John to receive his visions. He delves into a detailed scholastic explanation of what it means to be "in the spirit," defining it as a state where the natural intellect is moved by a supernatural force from God. The talk further breaks down the concept of divine locution, or communication from God, into three distinct types: those that come through the senses and two that are infused directly into the intellect, either with or without intellectual words.

The discussion then moves to the roles of angels and the nature of the Church as depicted in the Apocalypse. Angels are described as innumerable creatures who are superhuman but subordinate to God, acting as fellow servants with Christians. Their primary functions include adoration, executing God's will, conveying prophetic messages, and presenting the prayers of the saints to God. Following this, the lecture outlines the key attributes of the Church, portraying it as the Bride of Christ. It is described as apostolic, being built on the foundation of the apostles; catholic, embracing all nations; one, holy, social, and hierarchical in its structure.

Finally, the speaker addresses the topic of eschatology, or the study of the last things. He argues that the Apocalypse presents the current Messianic age on Earth and eternal life in heaven as a single, unified reality. According to the lecture, the "last age of the world" began with Christ's ascension and is in a state of continuous "dawning" that recurs whenever individuals are sanctified or nations convert. This process is viewed not as a simple chronological event but as an ongoing spiritual reality that leads believers from the state of grace on Earth to the full glory of heaven.

Bishop Williamson begins with a theological interpretation of biblical prophecy, asserting that divine revelations are intended exclusively for God's "servants" and not for the general public. Citing the proverb about not casting "pearls before swine," he argues that God's mysteries are deliberately veiled in signs and symbols. This is done not only to protect them from the "profane" but also to encourage dedicated study among the faithful. He applies this concept to the Book of Apocalypse, suggesting that events like the fall of Rome were prophesied for those with the wisdom to understand them.

The lecture then pivots to a detailed conspiracy theory surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The speaker dismisses the official findings of the Warren Commission as a "total whitewash" and alleges that the assassination was orchestrated by a coalition of the Israeli Mossad, the CIA, and the Mafia, led by Meyer Lansky. The primary motive, he claims, was Kennedy's opposition to Israel's development of an atomic bomb. According to the speaker, the murder was carried out by French hitmen to ensure neither the United States nor Israel could be directly implicated, and the subsequent cover-up has been maintained by the same powerful forces who control the government and media.

Ultimately, the speaker weaves these points into a broader, antisemitic worldview, arguing that Jewish power rises in direct opposition to Catholic faith. He describes Jewish people as a "cursed people" and the "principal agents of Satan," who manipulate global events for their own benefit, from orchestrating communism in Russia to exploiting its post-Soviet economy. He concludes that the ongoing turmoil in the world is a religious battle, where the decline of Catholic faith has allowed these forces to gain control, and suggests that only through a return to traditional Catholicism can this alleged grip on power be broken.

Recorded in 1996. Bishop Williamson continues his commentary on the Prologue of St. John (verses 6–14), moving from the eternal existence of the Word to His entry into history.

Key topics include:

• • The Witness: The distinction between the Uncreated Light (The Word) and the created light (John the Baptist).

  • The Tragedy of Rejection: "He came unto His own, and His own received Him not." A theological look at the rejection of Christ by the Jewish leadership.

  • Adoptive Sonship: How belief in His name gives us the power to become the "sons of God"—not by nature, but by grace.

  • Et Verbum Caro Factum Est: A profound defense of the Incarnation against the Docetist heresy (which claimed Christ only "seemed" human). The Bishop explains why the reality of Christ’s flesh and blood is essential for salvation.

Recorded in 1996. Bishop Williamson provides a line-by-line commentary on the famous Prologue of St. John (Verses 1-18). This lecture tackles the most profound theological concepts in Scripture regarding the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation.

Key topics include:

• • The Logos: Understanding the Greek concept of "The Word" and its eternal pre-existence with God the Father.

  • Creation: How all things were made through Him.

  • The Mystery of the Incarnation: "And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us."

  • Light vs. Darkness: The fundamental spiritual battle introduced in the very first verses.

Recorded in 1996. In this opening lecture, Bishop Richard Williamson lays the foundation for the study of the Gospel of St. John. He explains why St. John is symbolized by the Eagle—soaring directly to the heights of the Divinity of Christ—unlike the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) which focus more on His humanity.

Bishop Williamson delivers a speech focusing on traditional Catholic views regarding gender roles, both within the church and society at large. He discusses the historical perspective of women not singing in church, citing Pius X and St. Paul to argue that liturgical functions should be reserved for men. Williamson extends this argument to broader societal roles, suggesting that women are naturally suited for different functions than men, emphasizing traditional family structures and roles. He critiques modern equalitarian views, suggesting they conflict with natural law and divine order. Williamson also touches on the impact of liberalism on gender roles, the importance of men leading in faith and family, and the natural differences between men and women in reasoning and emotion. The speech concludes with a call for a return to traditional values in family and societal structures, highlighting the spiritual and practical implications of these roles.

Originally held on December 29 2012.

In his lecture, Bishop Williamson explores the dichotomy between the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church and the liberal ideologies that have infiltrated society over the past two centuries. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the encyclicals of the popes, especially those written in the last 200 years, as a means to grasp the Catholic Church's stance against the rising tide of liberalism. Bishop Williamson argues that modern liberalism, with its emphasis on the deification of man and the relegation of God to the sidelines, stands in direct opposition to the Catholic worldview, which places God at the center of the universe.

The lecture delves into the historical context of the Church's teachings, highlighting the shift in papal perspectives post-Vatican II and the contamination of the Church by modern liberal thought. Bishop Williamson criticizes the modern interpretation of liberty, particularly religious liberty, as corrupt and contrary to the Church's teachings. He points out the failure of Catholics to fully understand their faith, attributing this to a lack of catechism and proper religious education.

Bishop Williamson also touches upon the importance of critical thinking and reading as tools for Catholics to maintain their faith in a world that increasingly moves away from God. He challenges the notion that the Catholic religion is merely a source of comfort, instead highlighting the often difficult and demanding nature of true faith. The lecture concludes with a call for Catholics to engage more deeply with their faith, to think critically about the teachings of the Church, and to recognize the inherent conflict between the principles of modern liberalism and Catholic doctrine.