In a now-viral clip, Judge Arthur Engoron discusses how juries “sometimes get it wrong” and highlights his ability to override their verdicts through legal tools like “judgment notwithstanding the verdict.” While the law allows judges some leeway in these instances, his admission about factoring in personal emotions raises concerns about judicial impartiality and fairness. In this reaction video, we dive into: -Why impartiality is the cornerstone of our legal system. The potential risks of judges overriding jury decisions based on subjective reasoning. -How this perspective could impact public trust in the judiciary. -A fair legal system depends on the balance between juries and judges, but does this approach risk tipping the scales too far? We explore this pressing question and discuss why maintaining judicial neutrality is vital for democracy. 💬 Let’s Discuss: What are your thoughts on Judge Engoron’s remarks? Should judges have the power to overrule juries? Share your opinions in the comments below. 👍 Like, comment, and share your thoughts below. Do you stand with Israel or Palestine? ✅ Subscribe for more discussions on faith, liberty, politics, and history! 🎙️ Follow us: • / @unrulytruthpod • / theunrulytruth • https://x.com/unrulytruthpod • / unrulytruth #JudgeEngoron #JudicialImpartiality #JuryVerdicts #LegalSystem #Justice #UnrulyTruth #Podcast