![Attorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&T cover art](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51tqzz3fdnL._SL500_.jpg)
Attorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&T
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
This week, it’s a momentous case of constitutional law from Trinidad & Tobago, in a judgment from Sir Rabinder Singh, as we consider the constitutionality of sedition laws. Is sedition to ovague an offence to be legally certain? Can a guarantee of a ‘democratic’ State in the constitution be enough to strike a law down? Does Australian case law have any relevance? Listen to find out!
Link to Case: [2023] UKPC 36, T&T
Legal Style Blog homepage
Twitter: @legalstyleblog
E-mail: editor@legalstyle.co.uk
Legal Style Blog Guide to Uniform Privy Council Citations
What listeners say about Attorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&T
Average Customer RatingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.