Katie Whitlock is joined by her mom, Sara, with Jeff Cook stepping in as guest interviewer for a conversation about their relationship.

As a Type Two and a Type Three , they explore how their motivations shape connection, attention, and emotional needs within their family. They talk through family dynamics, parenting styles, and what it looked like to grow up in a household with strong relational energy but very different ways of expressing it.

The conversation also moves into more personal territory, reflecting on Sara’s cancer diagnosis, how it impacted the family, and how both of them now understand those years in light of their Enneagram work.

Connect with us at : www.aroundthecircle.org

A conversation on recovery—what it is, how it happens, and why most of us only find it after burnout. The group explores the difference between recovery and renewal, the role of daily habits, and how Enneagram type shapes what “rest” actually looks like. From naming excess and admitting powerlessness to rebuilding balance across the centers, this episode moves through both the theory and the lived reality of getting unstuck.

They also wrestle with deeper questions: Are we trying to get back to something, or move forward into something new? What does it mean to recover when life keeps disrupting us? And how do meaning, identity, and daily practices create the kind of resilience that can actually hold when things fall apart?

Join us on Tuesday Nights : HERE

In this episode, Jeff works through the opening section of Chapter Four of "Personality and Wholeness in Therapy," by Dr. Daniel Siegel, focusing on how personality forms through automatic processes beneath awareness. The discussion centers on Siegel’s framework of three core motivations—agency, bonding, and certainty—and how these map onto the Enneagram’s centers.

Jeff walks through each of the nine types using Siegel’s categories of “experience and express,” “contain and channel,” and “reframe and redirect,” translating dense neuroscience into practical Enneagram language. Along the way, he offers critiques, clarifies key ideas, and highlights where the model aligns—or conflicts—with traditional Enneagram understanding.