Try free for 30 days
-
Who Says You're Dead?
- Medical & Ethical Dilemmas for the Curious & Concerned
- Narrated by: Jonathan Yen
- Length: 8 hrs
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for $24.37
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Publisher's Summary
Drawing upon the author's two decades teaching medical ethics, as well as his work as a practicing psychiatrist, this profound and addictive little book offers up challenging ethical dilemmas and asks listeners, What would you do?
- A daughter gets tested to see if she's a match to donate a kidney to her father. The test reveals that she is not the man's biological daughter. Should the doctor tell the father? Or the daughter?
- A deaf couple prefers a deaf baby. Should they be allowed to use medical technology to ensure they have a child who can't hear?
- Who should get custody of an embryo created through IVF when a couple divorces?
- Or, when you or a loved one is on life support, Who says you're dead?
In short, engaging scenarios, Dr. Appel takes on hot-button issues that many of us will confront: genetic screening, sexuality, privacy, doctor-patient confidentiality. He unpacks each hypothetical with a brief reflection drawing from science, philosophy, and history, explaining how others have approached these controversies in real-world cases. Who Says You're Dead? is designed to defy easy answers and to stimulate thought and even debate among professionals and armchair ethicists alike.
More from the same
What listeners say about Who Says You're Dead?
Average Customer RatingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Timothy Mcardle
- 26-12-2022
Bullet points, lacks depth or analysis
With each topic being around 5 mins long, there is no depth or analysis. Was hoping to be presented with ethical and moral viewpoints perhaps which I had not considered myself. Instead, it's basically a list of facts, e.g X number of people have this, Y percentage of hospitals do that. Factual infotainment is different to moral & ethical considerations. I'm certain the author is more than capable of presenting the latter. Not here, however.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!