
Sold Out
How Broken Supply Chains, Surging Inflation and Political Instability Will Sink the Global Economy
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for $21.99
-
Narrated by:
-
James Rickards
-
By:
-
James Rickards
About this listen
Brought to you by Penguin.
The global supply chain is broken, perhaps for good. How did we get here and what happens next?
Empty shelves, queues for petrol and energy shortages: crises more familiar to those who lived through the 1960s and 1970s have now become a reality as global shipping times are squeezed, containers lie unopened at docks and supply shortages push up inflation, increasing the cost of consumer goods from milk to cars to building materials.
In Sold Out!, economic forecaster James Rickards (The Road to Ruin, The Death of Money) explains why the shelves are empty, who fractured the supply chain and why shortages will persist. Drawing on years of financial expertise, he breaks down the history and structure of business around the world to offer readers a behind-the-scenes look at what is happening and the steps they can take to mitigate the worst of what's to come. By going beyond the headlines to explain how globalised trade really works, Rickards presents an essential guide to navigating the coming storm.
©2022 James Rickards (P)2022 Penguin Audiothis is a shame because the topic of the book is very interesting to me, but I'm not going to submit myself to hours of his loony views, just so I can get to the essence of the books message.
far too political for a book about logistics
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Another masterclass from Rickards
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Fantastic book !!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Fantastic listen
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The story was repetitive, and somewhat paranoid in regards to scientific information, dictated by right wing echo chambers and conspiracy theories.
His assesment of history and statistics was concise, expansive and was more than required to make his point. It got boring at times. His commentary about political influences seemed unfiltered and (almost- but not) equally scathing across both sides of the aisle.
His understanding of geopolitics seems particularly good, as does his fiscal and financial IQ.
But his understanding of science seems to be garnered from Fox talking points, based on spin and without a consideration of the alternative to the narrative he is pushing.
His review of the Covid pandemic response was that of a Monday quarterbacks by the water cooler. It was a delusional take on how he would have made the perfect plays, not giving due thought to the massive impacts of the alternative actions that were never taken. It was impotently infuriating in its double standard and lack of understanding.
Vaccines were never intended to stop the spread, they were intended to relieve the pressure on hospitals and keep more people alive and active, which after all, is the basis of a healthy supply chain, as he keeps saying.
And I have no idea how he can conclude that masks don't successfully slow the spread of the disease. They have been proven endlessly to do exactly that.
As for climate, well he's already lost scientific credibility with his COVID assessment.
But to deny what is plainly happening before our eyes at such a rapid rate, that is coinciding exactly with the the greatest burn-off in the planet's history (over 100 years of industrial development), is more than ignorant and naive, it's downright disturbing.
And it's stupid, because industry can make a fortune out of providing the solution. To criticize those with the foresight and will to make a difference to what is an obvious and logical outcome to our actions (the great burn-off) stinks of either cronyism, or a sublime lack of imagination or understanding.
I suffered through this chapter to hear more about his clear inside knowledge of the financial system, which seems far less based on opinion, and more based on understanding of patterns through history and the interconnected nature of money systems.
It was worth the listen, as long as you can endure the ridiculous rantings of pseudo-scientific thoughts that are like fingernails down a chalkboard to any lucid mind.
And please, let's leave this Davos Great Reset rhetoric in the corridors of the insane asylums. I've never heard a more stupid conspiracy theory, and yet ironically, he is calling for a massive reset to the entire global supply chain infrastructure and economic alliances that will ultimately cost us our purchasing power, potentially impoverishing (to some degree) billions of people.
I'm for it, by the way for the long term health of the global community, but surely this is a some kind black irony between the pot and the kettle?!
Entrenched and unimaginative viewpoint
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Incredible economic insights
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Slow and boring
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Verging on conspiratorial
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
starts boring, ends in political rants
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
In addition, the beginning of the book was basically a 2nd year accounting lecture on supply chain terminology which was not only incredibly boring, but wasn't actually necessary in framing the rest of the content.
Selective facts lead to propaganda
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.