It’s March 19, Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

Let me explain something very simple.

If I am not subject to the Internal Revenue Code—

then I do not adopt the language of that code.

I don’t call myself a “non-resident alien.”

I don’t accept classifications that do not apply to me.

Words matter.

Definitions matter.

And the moment you adopt their terminology—

you may be stepping into their purview.

Now this is where people get into trouble.

They run toward strategies—

revocation of election… discharging…

all kinds of so-called remedies—

without understanding what they’re doing.

And that’s dangerous.

Because the real question is not:

“Does this work?”

The real question is:

Do you understand what you’re doing… and why?

Take this example.

Some people will take 26 U.S.C. 7701

and argue that the definition of “State” is limited to exclude the 50 States.

But then—

they turn around and take something like 6013(g)

and expand it beyond what it actually says within the code

to justify a strategy.

So ask yourself:

Can you limit one definition…

and expand another…

just to get the result you want?

No.

That’s not law.

That’s preference and presumption.

So instead of chasing ideas…

instead of trusting what sounds good…

Test it.

Understand it.

Be consistent.

Because if you don’t—

you’re stepping into something you do not control.

I don’t trust strategies.

I trust structure.

I trust definitions.

I trust consistency.

And if you want to protect yourself—

stop guessing.

Start understanding.

I have been involved with this effort for almost three decades.

I trust two sources and they provide excellent content, content that should be verified as well. One source has a link that describes the dangers of the ROE and some of the parties behind its use.

Caveat Emptor.

And as always—

may truth reign supreme.