Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-26 at 21:09 cover art

Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-26 at 21:09

Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-26 at 21:09

Listen for free

View show details

About this listen

 HEADLINESRemains of Ran Gvili Returned; Saga EndsIran policy showdown: sanctions and strikes debatedRafah aid hinges on ceasefire pledgesThe time is now 4:01 PM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.Today’s hourly briefing begins with a moment of closure in a long, painful chapter. After 843 days, the remains of Police Master Sergeant Ran Gvili were returned to Israel, marking the end of the last hostage saga from the Gaza war that began in October 2023. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the return an extraordinary achievement for Israel, while President Joe Biden and other US officials welcomed the development as a pivotal step in the Gaza ceasefire framework. Prime Minister Netanyahu said the mission is complete in the sense that every hostage has been accounted for, and he signaled that the next phase will focus on disarming Hamas and demilitarizing Gaza. President Herzog, addressing the nation, mourned with the Gvili family and thanked security forces for their efforts, while removing the public reminders of the hostages’ ordeal as a symbolic gesture of closure. Across the political spectrum, leaders pledged to support families of the fallen and to pursue a durable security arrangement for Israel’s citizens.In Washington, reaction stressed that the Gaza ceasefire framework remains in effect as the focus shifts to the next phase. Former President Trump praised the coordination among the United States, Israel, Egypt, and other partners in achieving the ceasefire and the return of hostages, while Jared Kushner highlighted what he described as improved cooperation that helped locate and recover the remains. The White House signaled that the next stage will center on disarmament and the broader Gaza stabilization plan, with officials noting that the US continues to support efforts to reopen humanitarian corridors and facilitate aid to Gaza under agreed terms. Hamas and its allies stressed their commitment to the ceasefire obligations, even as their rhetoric emphasized the need for ongoing guarantees of prisoner exchanges and the protection of civilians.In Israel, the day’s events were met with a broad spectrum of political voices. Security minister Itamar Ben Gvir lauded the security forces as the firewall that protected the state on a dangerous day, while opposition members welcomed the return but called for accountability for the broader failures surrounding the October 7 assault. Opposition leader Yair Lapid removed his own hostage ribbon in a symbolic gesture of release, while signaling readiness to pursue parliamentary inquiries to illuminate what went wrong and how future failures may be prevented. The implications of the rescue and return are already shaping discussions about Israel’s security posture, hostage policy, and the path to a broader disarmament and reconstruction process in Gaza.Beyond Gaza, the war’s toll and the region’s security dynamics continue to draw international attention. In Europe, a debate over how to influence Iran’s leadership is intensifying. A European Parliament resolution calling on the designations of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and heightened sanctions has prompted comments from lawmakers who argue that only broad, coordinated pressure will push Iran toward change. One member of the European Parliament described military intervention as a possible final step, a view tied to broader arguments about destabilizing Tehran’s influence and reducing its capacity to support regional proxies. The discussion reflects a wider view in some capitals that a combination of sanctions, diplomatic pressure, and, if necessary, limited military actions could alter the strategic balance in the Middle East. In parallel, a senior European negotiator acknowledged that public demonstrations in Iran have waxed and waned, but civilians repeatedly express a willingness to endure hardship to see change, including calls for stronger sanctions and reduced support for the regime’s security apparatus.In Washington’s analysis of Iran policy, ongoing discussions consider all options short of a broad footprint on the ground. Reports describe consideration of targeted strikes against security commanders and facilities tied to the killings of protesters, with a possible naval option that would curb Tehran’s oil exports as a lever to pressure leadership without deploying large-scale ground forces. Analysts note that any such move would need careful coordination with regional partners and a clear plan to minimize civilian harm, while seeking to avoid a broad escalation that could draw in other regional actors. The broader question remains: what mix of sanctions, diplomacy, and potential coercive measures would most credibly threaten the regime’s stability while preserving regional and global interests?Iran’s internal crisis and external outreach continue to shape the regional security calculus. Leaks and commentary ...
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.