Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-19 at 09:11 cover art

Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-19 at 09:11

Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-19 at 09:11

Listen for free

View show details

About this listen

HEADLINESGaza governance board expands; Israel voices alarmKnesset pushes Oct 7 inquiry billNew F-35I jets bolster Israel deterrenceThe time is now 4:01 AM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.Today’s hourlies focus on developments shaping the Middle East’s security architecture, alongside domestic political and economic dynamics in Israel, with careful attention to how US policy and regional actors interact with Israeli and Jewish perspectives for an international audience.Kazakhstan’s president to join Trump’s Gaza peace initiativeKazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev will join the US-led Gaza governance effort, joining a Board of Peace proposed by President Donald Trump. Kazakhstan’s spokesman cited that Tokayev was among the first world leaders invited and that he confirmed Kazakhstan’s intention to contribute to lasting peace in the Middle East. The board would be chaired for life by Trump and would begin by addressing Gaza, with plans to expand to other conflicts as membership grows. Kazakhstan is described as a founding state in this arrangement. The White House has not publicly named Tokayev among confirmed members. The move underscores Washington’s push to broaden international participation in shaping post-conflict governance in Gaza, a process that Egypt, Qatar, Turkey, and other regional actors are watching closely for their roles in any future arrangements.Gaza governance board draws Turkish and Qatari representation; Israeli concerns voicedTrump’s plan to establish a Gaza governance framework includes senior representatives from Turkey and Qatar on the Gaza Executive Board. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and Qatar’s Ali al-Thawadi are among the named participants. Israeli officials have identified red lines around Turkish leadership roles and closer Turkish influence in Gaza, warning that such arrangements could affect Israel’s security calculus. In Jerusalem, Prime Minister Netanyahu and others said they were not consulted about the board’s final composition, stressing that Israel’s security needs and governance interests should be central in decisions about Gaza’s post-conflict administration. The broader concern is whether international governance could dilute Israel’s role in decisions over border security, disarmament, and oversight of reconstruction.If disarmament stalls, Israel could pursue its own disarmament strategyAnalysts tracking Trump’s Phase II framework warn that if Hamas refuses to disarm and a peace-enforcement mechanism does not materialize, Israel might be compelled to act independently to neutralize Hamas’s weapons and capabilities. Such a scenario could involve mobilizing reserve formations and resuming operations in Gaza City and adjacent areas. Observers note that the plan’s credibility rests on the international community’s ability to provide an effective security presence in Gaza to deter resurgent arms proliferation, a point of contention among Israeli officials who worry about the ability of outside forces to enforce disarmament and stabilize a long-term ceasefire.Israel’s domestic debate over Oct. 7 inquiry advances; bereaved families protestIn Jerusalem, a Knesset panel advanced a political inquiry bill that would create a separate, Knesset-led process to investigate the October 7 attacks, diverging from the traditional state commission model. Bereaved families and opponents of the government’s approach demonstrated outside the Knesset, arguing for a state commission with independent judicial oversight. The bill would require a supermajority to appoint members and, if consensus cannot be reached, would allow the coalition and opposition to propose three members each, with the Speaker of the Knesset making final appointments for the contested seats. Netanyahu’s government contends the inquiry should be structured differently from the past, while opposition leaders warn that the bill could become a vehicle for political whitewashing. The debate reflects a deep, enduring tension in Israeli governance over accountability and accountability mechanisms in the wake of the war.Netanyahu pushes back on Gaza board composition; consultations with foreign ministerFollowing the board’s disclosure, Netanyahu publicly criticized the lack of coordination with Israel and instructed Foreign Minister Israel Sa’ar to raise the issue with the US secretary of state. The prime minister summoned meetings with the security cabinet, the full government, and coalition chairs to align Israel’s position with its security requirements. The issue highlights the persistent friction between Washington’s multi-party approach to Gaza’s future governance and Israel’s insistence on safeguarding its core security interests, including ensuring an autonomous and credible mechanism for disarmament oversight and the protection of Israeli security gains.Gaza’s reality on the ground: Hamas’s ...
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.