Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-12 at 06:09 cover art

Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-12 at 06:09

Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-12 at 06:09

Listen for free

View show details

About this listen

 HEADLINESNYC Hamas chants trigger antisemitism debateAdelaide writers row sparks hate speech crackdownDOJ subpoenas Powell fuels Fed independence debateThe time is now 1:00 AM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.At 1:00 a.m. Eastern, this is an international news update balancing security concerns, political rhetoric, and the ongoing effort to confront antisemitism with clarity and due process. Across the United States, New York in particular, political leaders were confronted this week with a demonstrable test of where free speech ends and calls for violence or support for designated terrorist groups begin. In New York City, a protest outside a synagogue linked to an Israeli real estate event drew attention for banners, flags, and chants that left no room for ambiguity about the protesters’ stance toward Hamas. The Palestinian Assembly for Liberation, known as PAL-Awda, used the moment to underscore that its members regard Hamas as a legitimate armed actor in the current conflict, a position that drew swift condemnation from a broad spectrum of elected officials.New York’s new political landscape quickly placed emphasis on a central question: when does intense political speech cross into overt endorsement of violence, and who speaks for a city that bills itself as a bastion of pluralism and safety for worshippers and protesters alike? New York City’s newly elected mayor, Zohran Mamdani, who on taking office had paused an earlier move to adopt the IHRA working definition of antisemitism, stated on the record that chants in support of a terrorist organization have no place in the city and that safety for houses of worship and the right to protest must be protected. Shortly thereafter, senior Democratic figures — Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, New York Attorney-General Letitia James, and New York Governor Kathy Hochul — issued statements condemning the chants and reaffirming Hamas’s designation as a terrorist organization. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez joined the chorus on social media, calling out the act as antisemitic when it was directed at a Jewish neighborhood.The rapid sequence of condemnations raised questions about the internal calculus within the Democratic Party. Was this a spontaneous moment of moral clarity, or a signal that a broader shift is underway in how the party handles antisemitism and support for Palestinian political rhetoric? Critics on both sides pushed back: supporters of Palestinian rights argued that condemnation of violence should not be conflated with censure of peaceful advocacy or criticism of Israeli policy; detractors warned that failure to draw clear lines against endorsing a terrorist organization risks normalizing antisemitism in political discourse. The Jerusalem Post editorialized that condemning Hamas and its supporters is the correct stance, no matter who says it, while acknowledging that the backlash to these statements reveals a persistent fragility in public dialogue on this fraught issue. The episode underscores a broader cultural and political challenge: antisemitism must be confronted consistently, not treated as a political lever or a rare headline event.Looking ahead, observers note that the midterm political environment in the United States could make explicit condemnations of terrorism-related support appear as politically advantageous, especially as candidates seek to mobilize diverse coalitions. Yet the same observers emphasize that the real test is ongoing commitment: standing up against antisemitism should be reflexive, not a one-off calculation tied to an immediate incident or electoral timetable.Beyond the United States, similar tensions surfaced on the other side of the world. In Australia, the fallout from the Bondi Beach mass shooting, which the authorities say had links to extremist ideology, spilled into the arts world. The Adelaide Festival announced the decision to disinvite Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah from February’s Writers Week, saying it would not be culturally appropriate to program her at this sensitive moment. The move triggered a wave of withdrawals from dozens of writers who saw the decision as part of a broader debate over how to balance free speech with the duty to counter antisemitism and hate speech. Board members and the festival’s leadership resigned in the wake of the controversy, which Australian officials linked to a nationwide reckoning on hate speech and social cohesion. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese signaled intention to empower parliament to enact tougher hate-speech laws, while New South Wales announced measures to curb expressions of hate through stricter controls against hate preachers and broader penalties for violations. Critics warned that such measures risk suppressing legitimate debate and religious practice, hinting at the delicate line between protecting communities and preserving freedom of speech.In that same global frame, the ...
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.