Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-10 at 06:10 cover art

Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-10 at 06:10

Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-10 at 06:10

Listen for free

View show details

About this listen

 HEADLINESBreaking Breads union drive politicizes wage talksIDF West Bank ops escalate, 2 killedGabbard sidelined from Venezuela planningThe time is now 1:01 AM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.An unusual push by workers at an Israeli-owned bakery in New York has spotlighted the growing debate over how political issues intersect with labor organizing in the United States. Breaking Breads, the group behind a campaign to form a union at Breads Bakery on the Upper West Side, has argued that the company should cut its ties to Israel in response to what they describe as genocide in Palestine. Supporters gathered at the shop to voice solidarity, while critics warned that such demands risk injecting foreign policy into a wage negotiation. The incident has drawn attention from labor scholars, Jewish community leaders, and observers of the broader debate over anti-Israel sentiment in American life.Two veteran labor scholars who were consulted for the analysis say the approach taken by Breaking Breads is not typical of union drives. They note that unions have pressed political stances on national policy in some cases, but using union organizing to push a corporate divestment or withdrawal from a country is uncommon and may complicate the path to recognition. Under US labor law, the core bargaining subjects are wages, hours, and working conditions. Issues rooted in a company’s political or foreign commitments are not typically mandatory bargaining topics, and management can refuse to negotiate over them if such topics are proposed as conditions for a contract. Even so, the legal terrain can become tangled if workers allege unfair labor practices or seek to leverage their activism to support a broader political message.At this stage, it remains unclear whether Breaking Breads can gain formal recognition as a bargaining unit at all. The group has claimed that more than 30 percent of Breads’ workers signed authorization cards, a figure well short of what is usually required to trigger an election. To win a union election, a majority of participating workers must favor the union. Still, even if a union is recognized, the question of whether Israel-related issues would be placed on the bargaining table is unlikely to be treated as a mandatory subject of bargaining. One analyst emphasized that a conflict over a company’s foreign ties is generally not a topic that must be negotiated; if it comes up, management can steer the conversation toward core employment terms or reject the issue as outside the scope of bargaining.The workers have raised concerns about working conditions, wages, and scheduling, and if a contract is reached, those issues will be addressed through bargaining. Management has stated that it does not regard political issues as appropriate for negotiation and has pointed to the bakery as a diverse workplace where people of varying beliefs work together around a shared mission. Regardless of how the dispute evolves, observers say the episode underscores the broader trend of labor unions increasingly engaging with political topics, sometimes reflecting shifts within the labor movement itself and its views on foreign policy.Beyond the workplace, the episode has sparked discussion about the climate for anti-Israel sentiment in the United States. Critics warn that high-profile cases can feed a narrative that politicizes employment relations or marginalizes supporters of Israel. Pro-Israel advocates have urged caution, urging the public to separate labor rights and employment grievances from foreign policy debates. The implications for American workers who are themselves diverse in their views on Israel and the region remain a live question for unions and employers alike.Turning to the security front, a major defense concern in the region centers on the West Bank. In a rare, detailed interview with Walla, the commander of the IDF’s Battalion 101 in the Paratroopers Brigade described the operational challenges in a territory where the proximity of Palestinian villages to Israeli communities complicates military planning. The commander stressed that in Gaza or Lebanon, boundaries and threats are more clearly mapped, whereas in the West Bank the scale of settlement corridors and the dispersion of communities require a different approach. Over the past two months, the battalion carried out four operations, resulting in the killing of two terrorists and the arrest of 26 suspects, with another operation leading to the arrest of 40 individuals overnight. The commander described a demanding mission: protect multiple vital assets across a large, densely populated area where rapid response coordination can hinge on minutes rather than seconds. The account underscores how the West Bank presents a form of complexity distinct from Gaza or Lebanon, with ongoing questions about governance, security, and the balance between military and civilian needs.In related regional...
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.