"Measuring no CoT math time horizon (single forward pass)" by ryan_greenblatt
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
Important caveat: To get human completion times, I ask Opus 4.5 (with thinking) to estimate how long it would take the median AIME participant to complete a given problem.These times seem roughly reasonable to me, but getting some actual human baselines and using these to correct Opus 4.5's estimates would be better.
Here are the 50% reliability time horizon results:
I find that Opus 4.5 has a no-CoT 50% reliability time horizon of 3.5 minutes and that time horizon has been doubling every 9 months.
In an earlier post (Recent LLMs can leverage filler tokens or repeated problems to improve (no-CoT) math performance), I found that repeating the problem substantially boosts performance.In the above plot, if [...]
---
Outline:
(02:33) Some details about the time horizon fit and data
(04:17) Analysis
(06:59) Appendix: scores for Gemini 3 Pro
(11:41) Appendix: full result tables
(11:46) Time Horizon - Repetitions
(12:07) Time Horizon - Filler
The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
December 26th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Ty5Bmg7P6Tciy2uj2/measuring-no-cot-math-time-horizon-single-forward-pass
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.