Split-Second Decisions Under Fire
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
Listen in!
Takeaways:
- Use-of-force decisions are judged without the benefit of hindsight—by law.
- Deadly threats don’t always look like guns or knives.
- Rocks can constitute lethal force depending on context and intent.
- Once a threat is perceived, the body doesn’t instantly de-escalate.
- Officers must decide in seconds what others analyze for months.
- Fitness and confidence directly affect escalation decisions.
- Out-of-shape officers are more likely to rely on lethal force.
- Tasers and less-lethal tools are not guaranteed solutions.
- Fear of public backlash changes officer behavior in dangerous ways.
- Social media incentivizes outrage, not understanding.
- Many situations escalate because force wasn’t applied early enough.
- Body cameras protect truth—but also fuel Monday-morning quarterbacking.
- Legal justification does not equal moral comfort.
- Modern policing creates hesitation that can cost lives.
- Training gaps leave officers unprepared for real-world chaos.
- Officer survival and public safety must remain the priority.
Thank you for listening to this episoce of FIT Responder!
Thank you for listening to Fit Responder. If you would like to see if it's a fit to work with us in any capacity, please visit FitResponder.com as well follow us on Instagram at @fitresponder
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.